The stage for the mystery play also serves as a whipping post for Quasimodo, an old alley, and a bell tower. Instead of large sets which, while nice, are also costly, this version is more humble. A rose window and some lights are all that is needed to convey the idea of a cathedral interior. I dare to say that Parīzes Dievmātes Katedrāle looks better than the 1977 version. While that's not saying much, it goes to show how limitations can help and when they can hinder. In the '77 film, the minimal sets were distracting. Here, they are engrossing.
The lighting around Gudule makes her stand out as abnormal |
Esmeralda dragged before the Hellish mob |
It also is applied very well with Quasimodo. The areas around him are often obscured in shadow, making the misshapen hunchback catch your eye. The light around him, unlike the harsh blackness, is cool, and melancholy. Scenes with Frollo are also very dark, but the little light surrounding him is white and threatening.
They didn't have to do these things. They could have easily stuck to flat stage lighting, but they didn't. They use it to help tell the story, which is never a bad thing.
The costumes, unlike the sets, are highly detailed. Every character is visually distinct, which is important for any form of stage entertainment. Every person in the audience should be able to tell what is happening no matter where they are seated. The makeup is also well done. Frollo and Gudule have age makeup on, and look like they have gotten older since the opening scenes. Quasimodo's makeup, while not as grotesque as the novel, is made up by actor's performance. The ways he contorts his body make him look the part.
On the whole, the production values are really impressive.
Next: Music
No comments:
Post a Comment